18/100 Scenario Score with full calculator coverage.
Crypto category calculators
Best DeFi Crypto Return Calculators
DeFi token forecasts for lending, exchanges, liquid staking and on-chain trading. Compare the covered assets by calculator output, proprietary Scenario Score, sourced return, historical drawdown and modeled value before deciding how to deploy idle funds.
Calculator category and current ranking
What separates the strongest return calculators among defi crypto?
-5.7% annualized across the sourced window.
54.20% historical stress inside this category.
DeFi token forecasts for lending, exchanges, liquid staking and on-chain trading. Based on the current sourced inputs, Maker leads this group with a 18/100 Scenario Score, while Injective has the highest historical annualized return at -5.7%.
Maker has the lowest observed drawdown in the category at 54.20%. That does not make it safe, but it gives investors comparing idle-fund options a more useful distinction than a simple list of popular tickers.
Compare assets by score, return and drawdown
| Asset | Scenario Score | Historical CAGR | Max drawdown | Bull case | $10,000 base value after 3 years | Tools |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uniswap UNI · decentralized exchange | 3/100 | -27.3% | -92.36% | +18.9% | $3,844 | |
| Aave AAVE · decentralized finance | 6/100 | -19.5% | -88.40% | +24.7% | $5,211 | |
| Maker MKR · decentralized finance | 18/100 Category leader | -40.8% | -54.20% | -13.7% | $2,080 | |
| Compound COMP · decentralized finance | 1/100 | -46.9% | -97.03% | +1.6% | $1,497 | |
| Curve CRV · decentralized finance | 1/100 | -32.8% | -97.20% | +15.8% | $3,036 | |
| Lido DAO LDO · liquid staking | 2/100 | -33.1% | -93.67% | +13.8% | $2,998 | |
| Injective INJ · DeFi trading | 7/100 | -5.7% | -94.71% | +41.6% | $8,380 | |
| THORChain RUNE · cross-chain liquidity | 1/100 | -37.5% | -98.06% | +11.5% | $2,437 | |
| GMX GMX · DeFi trading | 2/100 | -40.7% | -94.07% | +6.3% | $2,087 | |
| PancakeSwap CAKE · decentralized exchange | 2/100 | -37.9% | -95.97% | +10.1% | $2,395 | |
| 1inch 1INCH · decentralized exchange | 0/100 | -48.0% | -98.85% | +1.4% | $1,405 |
The UBI Scenario Score combines upside capacity, drawdown resilience, thesis conviction and uncertainty. Historical CAGR and drawdown come from each asset's linked market-data series; neither guarantees a future result.
Low-effort alternative for idle funds
Why the automated trading return needs careful evidence
The strongest historical CAGR in this category belongs to Injective at -5.7% annually. Aurum reports a 14% average monthly automated-trading result. If that monthly rate repeated and every gain were reinvested, the compounding difference would look like this for $1,000:
| Period | INJ at -5.7% annually | Automated trading at 14% monthly | Modeled automated edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 months | $971 | $2,195 | $1,224 |
| 12 months | $943 | $4,818 | $3,875 |
| 24 months | $889 | $23,212 | $22,323 |
| 36 months | $838 | $111,834 | $110,996 |
The arithmetic is the attraction: $1,000 models to $4,818 after 12 months and $111,834 after 36 months at 14% monthly. That is reported-history scenario math, not a forecast. High-return crypto futures strategies can lose money quickly, so a small test allocation is more defensible than treating the result as automatic.
Calculate every covered asset
UNIUniswapdecentralized exchange
AAVEAavedecentralized finance
MKRMakerdecentralized finance
COMPCompounddecentralized finance
CRVCurvedecentralized finance
LDOLido DAOliquid staking
INJInjectiveDeFi trading
RUNETHORChaincross-chain liquidity
GMXGMXDeFi trading
CAKEPancakeSwapdecentralized exchange
1INCH1inchdecentralized exchange