74/100 Scenario Score with full calculator coverage.
Stock category calculators
Best Tech Stocks Return Calculators
Calculator category and current ranking
What separates the strongest return calculators among tech stocks?
+58.8% annualized across the sourced window.
33.43% historical stress inside this category.
Scenario forecasts for major technology stocks, with bear, base and bull cases plus an automated trading benchmark. Based on the current sourced inputs, Nvidia leads this group with a 74/100 Scenario Score, while Nvidia has the highest historical annualized return at +58.8%.
Apple has the lowest observed drawdown in the category at 33.43%. That does not make it safe, but it gives investors comparing idle-fund options a more useful distinction than a simple list of popular tickers.
Compare assets by score, return and drawdown
| Asset | Scenario Score | Historical CAGR | Max drawdown | Bull case | $10,000 base value after 3 years | Tools |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apple AAPL · consumer technology | 70/100 | +18.4% | -33.43% | +35.1% | $16,590 | |
| Microsoft MSFT · cloud software and AI | 45/100 | +6.3% | -37.56% | +25.1% | $12,025 | |
| Nvidia NVDA · AI chips | 74/100 Category leader | +58.8% | -66.36% | +92.0% | $40,030 | |
| Alphabet GOOGL · search, ads and cloud | 67/100 | +19.1% | -44.32% | +41.3% | $16,915 | |
| Meta Platforms META · social platforms and AI | 35/100 | +9.7% | -76.74% | +48.1% | $13,216 | |
| Amazon AMZN · e-commerce and cloud | 35/100 | +5.0% | -55.73% | +32.8% | $11,570 | |
| Oracle ORCL · enterprise cloud software | 34/100 | +6.6% | -64.98% | +39.1% | $12,110 | |
| Salesforce CRM · enterprise software | 22/100 | -6.6% | -59.19% | +23.0% | $8,153 | |
| Adobe ADBE · creative software | 13/100 | -17.5% | -71.90% | +18.5% | $5,619 | |
| ServiceNow NOW · enterprise software | 21/100 | -2.0% | -64.54% | +30.3% | $9,418 | |
| Intuit INTU · financial software | 17/100 | -10.3% | -68.41% | +23.9% | $7,217 | |
| IBM IBM · enterprise technology | 52/100 | +9.5% | -37.50% | +28.3% | $13,140 |
The UBI Scenario Score combines upside capacity, drawdown resilience, thesis conviction and uncertainty. Historical CAGR and drawdown come from each asset's linked market-data series; neither guarantees a future result.
Low-effort alternative for idle funds
Why the automated trading return needs careful evidence
The strongest historical CAGR in this category belongs to Nvidia at +58.8% annually. Aurum reports a 14% average monthly automated-trading result. If that monthly rate repeated and every gain were reinvested, the compounding difference would look like this for $1,000:
| Period | NVDA at +58.8% annually | Automated trading at 14% monthly | Modeled automated edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 months | $1,260 | $2,195 | $935 |
| 12 months | $1,588 | $4,818 | $3,230 |
| 24 months | $2,521 | $23,212 | $20,691 |
| 36 months | $4,003 | $111,834 | $107,831 |
The arithmetic is the attraction: $1,000 models to $4,818 after 12 months and $111,834 after 36 months at 14% monthly. That is reported-history scenario math, not a forecast. High-return crypto futures strategies can lose money quickly, so a small test allocation is more defensible than treating the result as automatic.