42/100 Scenario Score with full calculator coverage.
Stock category calculators
Best EV Stocks Return Calculators
Electric vehicle stock forecast pages for Tesla, Rivian, Lucid, NIO and legacy automakers. Compare the covered assets by calculator output, proprietary Scenario Score, sourced return, historical drawdown and modeled value before deciding how to deploy idle funds.
Calculator category and current ranking
What separates the strongest return calculators among ev stocks?
+9.4% annualized across the sourced window.
59.46% historical stress inside this category.
Electric vehicle stock forecast pages for Tesla, Rivian, Lucid, NIO and legacy automakers. Based on the current sourced inputs, General Motors leads this group with a 42/100 Scenario Score, while General Motors has the highest historical annualized return at +9.4%.
General Motors has the lowest observed drawdown in the category at 59.46%. That does not make it safe, but it gives investors comparing idle-fund options a more useful distinction than a simple list of popular tickers.
Compare assets by score, return and drawdown
| Asset | Scenario Score | Historical CAGR | Max drawdown | Bull case | $10,000 base value after 3 years | Tools |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tesla TSLA · electric vehicles and autonomy | 32/100 | +7.5% | -73.63% | +44.3% | $12,416 | |
| Rivian RIVN · electric vehicles | 2/100 | -34.8% | -95.12% | +12.8% | $2,777 | |
| Lucid LCID · electric vehicles | 0/100 | -51.5% | -99.17% | -1.9% | $1,143 | |
| NIO NIO · electric vehicles | 3/100 | -35.7% | -93.15% | +10.9% | $2,663 | |
| Ford F · automotive | 24/100 | +1.2% | -65.50% | +33.9% | $10,352 | |
| General Motors GM · automotive | 42/100 Category leader | +9.4% | -59.46% | +39.2% | $13,104 |
The UBI Scenario Score combines upside capacity, drawdown resilience, thesis conviction and uncertainty. Historical CAGR and drawdown come from each asset's linked market-data series; neither guarantees a future result.
Low-effort alternative for idle funds
Why the automated trading return needs careful evidence
The strongest historical CAGR in this category belongs to General Motors at +9.4% annually. Aurum reports a 14% average monthly automated-trading result. If that monthly rate repeated and every gain were reinvested, the compounding difference would look like this for $1,000:
| Period | GM at +9.4% annually | Automated trading at 14% monthly | Modeled automated edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 months | $1,046 | $2,195 | $1,149 |
| 12 months | $1,094 | $4,818 | $3,724 |
| 24 months | $1,197 | $23,212 | $22,015 |
| 36 months | $1,310 | $111,834 | $110,524 |
The arithmetic is the attraction: $1,000 models to $4,818 after 12 months and $111,834 after 36 months at 14% monthly. That is reported-history scenario math, not a forecast. High-return crypto futures strategies can lose money quickly, so a small test allocation is more defensible than treating the result as automatic.
Calculate every covered asset
TSLATeslaelectric vehicles and autonomy
RIVNRivianelectric vehicles
LCIDLucidelectric vehicles
NIONIOelectric vehicles
FFordautomotive
GMGeneral Motorsautomotive