88/100 Scenario Score with full calculator coverage.
Stock category calculators
Best Energy Stocks Return Calculators
Oil, gas and energy stock forecasts grouped for investors comparing sector upside. Compare the covered assets by calculator output, proprietary Scenario Score, sourced return, historical drawdown and modeled value before deciding how to deploy idle funds.
4 calculators · 4 primary source series · 0 fallback series · latest close 2026-09-11.
Calculator category and current ranking
What separates the strongest return calculators among energy stocks?
+25.0% annualized across the sourced window.
20.65% historical stress inside this category.
Oil, gas and energy stock forecasts grouped for investors comparing sector upside. Based on the current sourced inputs, Exxon Mobil leads this group with a 88/100 Scenario Score, while Exxon Mobil has the highest historical annualized return at +25.0%.
Exxon Mobil has the lowest observed drawdown in the category at 20.65%. That does not make it safe, but it gives investors comparing idle-fund options a more useful distinction than a simple list of popular tickers.
Compare assets by score, return and drawdown
| Asset | Scenario Score | Historical CAGR | Max drawdown | Bull case | $10,000 base value after 3 years | Tools |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exxon Mobil XOM · energy | 88/100 Category leader | +25.0% | -20.65% | +35.3% | $19,513 | |
| Chevron CVX · energy | 70/100 | +17.4% | -28.89% | +31.8% | $16,173 | |
| ConocoPhillips COP · energy | 69/100 | +19.3% | -38.74% | +38.7% | $16,975 | |
| Occidental Petroleum OXY · energy | 62/100 | +18.6% | -52.47% | +44.8% | $16,665 |
The UBI Scenario Score combines upside capacity, drawdown resilience, thesis conviction and uncertainty. Historical CAGR and drawdown come from each asset's linked market-data series; neither guarantees a future result.
Low-effort alternative for idle funds
Why the automated trading return needs careful evidence
The strongest historical CAGR in this category belongs to Exxon Mobil at +25.0% annually. Aurum reports a 14% average monthly automated-trading result. If that monthly rate repeated and every gain were reinvested, the compounding difference would look like this for $1,000:
| Period | XOM at +25.0% annually | Automated trading at 14% monthly | Modeled automated edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 months | $1,118 | $2,195 | $1,077 |
| 12 months | $1,250 | $4,818 | $3,568 |
| 24 months | $1,562 | $23,212 | $21,651 |
| 36 months | $1,951 | $111,834 | $109,883 |
The arithmetic is the attraction: $1,000 models to $4,818 after 12 months and $111,834 after 36 months at 14% monthly. That is reported-history scenario math, not a forecast. High-return crypto futures strategies can lose money quickly, so a small test allocation is more defensible than treating the result as automatic.
Calculate every covered asset
Each card shows the current score, source freshness, base return and stress drawdown before the reader opens a deeper calculator.
XOMExxon Mobilenergy
Score 88/100 · +25.0% base · 20.6% drawdown
Latest close 2026-09-11 · Nasdaq primary
CVXChevronenergy
Score 70/100 · +17.4% base · 28.9% drawdown
Latest close 2026-09-11 · Nasdaq primary
COPConocoPhillipsenergy
Score 69/100 · +19.3% base · 38.7% drawdown
Latest close 2026-09-11 · Nasdaq primary
OXYOccidental Petroleumenergy
Score 62/100 · +18.6% base · 52.5% drawdown
Latest close 2026-09-11 · Nasdaq primary