81/100 Scenario Score with full calculator coverage.
Stock category calculators
Best Dividend Stocks Return Calculators
Calculator category and current ranking
What separates the strongest return calculators among dividend stocks?
+21.6% annualized across the sourced window.
20.65% historical stress inside this category.
Dividend and defensive stock forecast pages with passive return scenarios and comparison math. Based on the current sourced inputs, Exxon Mobil leads this group with a 81/100 Scenario Score, while Exxon Mobil has the highest historical annualized return at +21.6%.
Exxon Mobil has the lowest observed drawdown in the category at 20.65%. That does not make it safe, but it gives investors comparing idle-fund options a more useful distinction than a simple list of popular tickers.
Compare assets by score, return and drawdown
| Asset | Scenario Score | Historical CAGR | Max drawdown | Bull case | $10,000 base value after 3 years | Tools |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Berkshire Hathaway BRK.B · conglomerate and insurance | 61/100 | +12.3% | -26.58% | +25.6% | $14,174 | |
| JPMorgan Chase JPM · banking | 67/100 | +18.6% | -40.65% | +39.0% | $16,695 | |
| Johnson & Johnson JNJ · healthcare | 56/100 | +9.1% | -23.63% | +20.9% | $12,982 | |
| Walmart WMT · retail | 74/100 | +18.8% | -26.01% | +31.8% | $16,746 | |
| Procter & Gamble PG · consumer staples | 42/100 | +1.4% | -24.63% | +13.7% | $10,420 | |
| Coca-Cola KO · consumer staples | 56/100 | +8.2% | -20.89% | +18.6% | $12,664 | |
| PepsiCo PEP · consumer staples | 34/100 | -2.2% | -34.72% | +15.1% | $9,346 | |
| McDonald's MCD · restaurants | 44/100 | +2.3% | -22.95% | +13.8% | $10,700 | |
| Exxon Mobil XOM · energy | 81/100 Category leader | +21.6% | -20.65% | +31.9% | $17,985 | |
| Chevron CVX · energy | 63/100 | +13.4% | -28.89% | +27.9% | $14,598 |
The UBI Scenario Score combines upside capacity, drawdown resilience, thesis conviction and uncertainty. Historical CAGR and drawdown come from each asset's linked market-data series; neither guarantees a future result.
Low-effort alternative for idle funds
Why the automated trading return needs careful evidence
The strongest historical CAGR in this category belongs to Exxon Mobil at +21.6% annually. Aurum reports a 14% average monthly automated-trading result. If that monthly rate repeated and every gain were reinvested, the compounding difference would look like this for $1,000:
| Period | XOM at +21.6% annually | Automated trading at 14% monthly | Modeled automated edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 months | $1,103 | $2,195 | $1,092 |
| 12 months | $1,216 | $4,818 | $3,602 |
| 24 months | $1,479 | $23,212 | $21,733 |
| 36 months | $1,798 | $111,834 | $110,036 |
The arithmetic is the attraction: $1,000 models to $4,818 after 12 months and $111,834 after 36 months at 14% monthly. That is reported-history scenario math, not a forecast. High-return crypto futures strategies can lose money quickly, so a small test allocation is more defensible than treating the result as automatic.