84/100 Scenario Score with full calculator coverage.
Stock category calculators
Best AI Stocks Return Calculators
Calculator category and current ranking
What separates the strongest return calculators among ai stocks?
+64.8% annualized across the sourced window.
37.56% historical stress inside this category.
AI stock forecast pages covering chips, software, servers and cloud names that investors already search for. Based on the current sourced inputs, Broadcom leads this group with a 84/100 Scenario Score, while Arm Holdings has the highest historical annualized return at +64.8%.
Microsoft has the lowest observed drawdown in the category at 37.56%. That does not make it safe, but it gives investors comparing idle-fund options a more useful distinction than a simple list of popular tickers.
Compare assets by score, return and drawdown
| Asset | Scenario Score | Historical CAGR | Max drawdown | Bull case | $10,000 base value after 3 years | Tools |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nvidia NVDA · AI chips | 74/100 | +58.8% | -66.36% | +92.0% | $40,030 | |
| Palantir PLTR · AI software | 68/100 | +42.3% | -79.14% | +81.9% | $28,821 | |
| Microsoft MSFT · cloud software and AI | 45/100 | +6.3% | -37.56% | +25.1% | $12,025 | |
| Alphabet GOOGL · search, ads and cloud | 67/100 | +19.1% | -44.32% | +41.3% | $16,915 | |
| Meta Platforms META · social platforms and AI | 35/100 | +9.7% | -76.74% | +48.1% | $13,216 | |
| AMD AMD · semiconductors | 73/100 | +38.3% | -65.45% | +71.0% | $26,452 | |
| Super Micro Computer SMCI · AI servers | 66/100 | +52.9% | -84.84% | +95.3% | $35,753 | |
| Broadcom AVGO · semiconductors and infrastructure software | 84/100 Category leader | +51.7% | -41.48% | +72.4% | $34,911 | |
| Oracle ORCL · enterprise cloud software | 34/100 | +6.6% | -64.98% | +39.1% | $12,110 | |
| Arm Holdings ARM · chip architecture | 78/100 | +64.8% | -53.97% | +91.8% | $44,774 | |
| Dell Technologies DELL · AI servers and PCs | 76/100 | +54.4% | -60.03% | +84.4% | $36,808 | |
| Cloudflare NET · internet infrastructure | 46/100 | +17.3% | -82.58% | +58.6% | $16,131 |
The UBI Scenario Score combines upside capacity, drawdown resilience, thesis conviction and uncertainty. Historical CAGR and drawdown come from each asset's linked market-data series; neither guarantees a future result.
Low-effort alternative for idle funds
Why the automated trading return needs careful evidence
The strongest historical CAGR in this category belongs to Arm Holdings at +64.8% annually. Aurum reports a 14% average monthly automated-trading result. If that monthly rate repeated and every gain were reinvested, the compounding difference would look like this for $1,000:
| Period | ARM at +64.8% annually | Automated trading at 14% monthly | Modeled automated edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 months | $1,284 | $2,195 | $911 |
| 12 months | $1,648 | $4,818 | $3,170 |
| 24 months | $2,717 | $23,212 | $20,496 |
| 36 months | $4,477 | $111,834 | $107,357 |
The arithmetic is the attraction: $1,000 models to $4,818 after 12 months and $111,834 after 36 months at 14% monthly. That is reported-history scenario math, not a forecast. High-return crypto futures strategies can lose money quickly, so a small test allocation is more defensible than treating the result as automatic.