Crypto category calculators

Best Layer 1 Crypto Return Calculators

Layer 1 crypto forecast pages for smart-contract and base-chain assets. Compare the covered assets by calculator output, proprietary Scenario Score, sourced return, historical drawdown and modeled value before deciding how to deploy idle funds.

Ranking snapshot Compare table Aurum comparison All covered assets

Calculator category and current ranking

What separates the strongest return calculators among layer 1 crypto?

Best overall scoreTRON

69/100 Scenario Score with full calculator coverage.

Highest historical CAGRTRON

+31.6% annualized across the sourced window.

Lowest observed drawdownTRON

59.56% historical stress inside this category.

Layer 1 crypto forecast pages for smart-contract and base-chain assets. Based on the current sourced inputs, TRON leads this group with a 69/100 Scenario Score, while TRON has the highest historical annualized return at +31.6%.

TRON has the lowest observed drawdown in the category at 59.56%. That does not make it safe, but it gives investors comparing idle-fund options a more useful distinction than a simple list of popular tickers.

Compare assets by score, return and drawdown

Open TRON calculator Run TRX what-if tool

Asset	Scenario Score	Historical CAGR	Max drawdown	Bull case	$10,000 base value after 3 years	Tools
Ethereum ETH · smart contracts	14/100	-6.2%	-79.30%	+33.4%	$8,248	Calculator What-if Scenarios
Solana SOL · high-speed smart contracts	5/100	-9.6%	-96.27%	+38.6%	$7,400	Calculator What-if Scenarios
BNB BNB · exchange ecosystem token	37/100	+12.2%	-69.85%	+47.1%	$14,121	Calculator What-if Scenarios
Cardano ADA · smart contracts	2/100	-38.6%	-94.55%	+8.6%	$2,309	Calculator What-if Scenarios
Avalanche AVAX · smart contracts	2/100	-26.9%	-95.63%	+20.9%	$3,909	Calculator What-if Scenarios
NEAR Protocol NEAR · smart contracts	2/100	-23.0%	-95.23%	+24.6%	$4,567	Calculator What-if Scenarios
Aptos APT · smart contracts	1/100	-46.7%	-97.18%	+1.9%	$1,512	Calculator What-if Scenarios
Sui SUI · smart contracts	7/100	-15.0%	-87.68%	+28.9%	$6,143	Calculator What-if Scenarios
TRON TRX · payments and stablecoin rails	69/100 Category leader	+31.6%	-59.56%	+61.4%	$22,786	Calculator What-if Scenarios
Toncoin TON · messaging-linked crypto	15/100	-53.8%	-62.28%	-22.7%	$985	Calculator What-if Scenarios
Kaspa KAS · proof-of-work crypto	11/100	-59.8%	-71.83%	-23.9%	$649	Calculator What-if Scenarios
Hedera HBAR · enterprise blockchain	3/100	-21.6%	-92.77%	+24.8%	$4,819	Calculator What-if Scenarios

The UBI Scenario Score combines upside capacity, drawdown resilience, thesis conviction and uncertainty. Historical CAGR and drawdown come from each asset's linked market-data series; neither guarantees a future result.

Low-effort alternative for idle funds

Why the automated trading return needs careful evidence

The strongest historical CAGR in this category belongs to TRON at +31.6% annually. Aurum reports a 14% average monthly automated-trading result. If that monthly rate repeated and every gain were reinvested, the compounding difference would look like this for $1,000:

Aurum's reported 14% monthly benchmark compared with the strongest passive asset in this category.
Period	TRX at +31.6% annually	Automated trading at 14% monthly	Modeled automated edge
6 months	$1,147	$2,195	$1,048
12 months	$1,316	$4,818	$3,502
24 months	$1,732	$23,212	$21,481
36 months	$2,279	$111,834	$109,556

The arithmetic is the attraction: $1,000 models to $4,818 after 12 months and $111,834 after 36 months at 14% monthly. That is reported-history scenario math, not a forecast. High-return crypto futures strategies can lose money quickly, so a small test allocation is more defensible than treating the result as automatic.

Review the reported results first Open due diligence Size a limited test