Crypto category calculators

Best Layer 1 Crypto Return Calculators

Layer 1 crypto forecast pages for smart-contract and base-chain assets. Compare the covered assets by calculator output, proprietary Scenario Score, sourced return, historical drawdown and modeled value before deciding how to deploy idle funds.
Ranking snapshotCompare tableAurum comparisonAll covered assets

Calculator category and current ranking

What separates the strongest return calculators among layer 1 crypto?

Best overall scoreTRON

75/100 Scenario Score with full calculator coverage.

Highest historical CAGRTRON

+39.9% annualized across the sourced window.

Lowest observed drawdownTRON

59.56% historical stress inside this category.

Layer 1 crypto forecast pages for smart-contract and base-chain assets. Based on the current sourced inputs, TRON leads this group with a 75/100 Scenario Score, while TRON has the highest historical annualized return at +39.9%.

TRON has the lowest observed drawdown in the category at 59.56%. That does not make it safe, but it gives investors comparing idle-fund options a more useful distinction than a simple list of popular tickers.

Compare assets by score, return and drawdown

AssetScenario ScoreHistorical CAGRMax drawdownBull case$10,000 base value after 3 yearsTools
Ethereum
ETH · smart contracts
14/100-3.6%-79.30%+36.1%$8,961
Solana
SOL · high-speed smart contracts
39/100+21.4%-96.27%+69.6%$17,901
BNB
BNB · exchange ecosystem token
37/100+12.7%-69.85%+47.6%$14,303
Cardano
ADA · smart contracts
2/100-34.0%-95.15%+13.6%$2,875
Avalanche
AVAX · smart contracts
5/100-11.8%-95.63%+36.0%$6,852
NEAR Protocol
NEAR · smart contracts
7/100-5.9%-95.23%+41.8%$8,343
Aptos
APT · smart contracts
1/100-48.8%-96.89%-0.3%$1,343
Sui
SUI · smart contracts
6/100-19.6%-87.13%+24.0%$5,197
TRON
TRX · payments and stablecoin rails
75/100
Category leader
+39.9%-59.56%+69.7%$27,358
Toncoin
TON · messaging-linked crypto
7/100-51.2%-82.58%-9.9%$1,162
Kaspa
KAS · proof-of-work crypto
11/100-71.2%-72.23%-35.0%$240
Hedera
HBAR · enterprise blockchain
4/100-19.1%-92.77%+27.3%$5,295

The UBI Scenario Score combines upside capacity, drawdown resilience, thesis conviction and uncertainty. Historical CAGR and drawdown come from each asset's linked market-data series; neither guarantees a future result.

Low-effort alternative for idle funds

Why the automated trading return needs careful evidence

The strongest historical CAGR in this category belongs to TRON at +39.9% annually. Aurum reports a 14% average monthly automated-trading result. If that monthly rate repeated and every gain were reinvested, the compounding difference would look like this for $1,000:

PeriodTRX at +39.9% annuallyAutomated trading at 14% monthlyModeled automated edge
6 months$1,183$2,195$1,012
12 months$1,399$4,818$3,419
24 months$1,956$23,212$21,256
36 months$2,736$111,834$109,098

The arithmetic is the attraction: $1,000 models to $4,818 after 12 months and $111,834 after 36 months at 14% monthly. That is reported-history scenario math, not a forecast. High-return crypto futures strategies can lose money quickly, so a small test allocation is more defensible than treating the result as automatic.

Calculate every covered asset

ETHEthereumsmart contracts
SOLSolanahigh-speed smart contracts
BNBBNBexchange ecosystem token
ADACardanosmart contracts
AVAXAvalanchesmart contracts
NEARNEAR Protocolsmart contracts
APTAptossmart contracts
SUISuismart contracts
TRXTRONpayments and stablecoin rails
TONToncoinmessaging-linked crypto
KASKaspaproof-of-work crypto
HBARHederaenterprise blockchain