8/100 Scenario Score with full calculator coverage.
Crypto category calculators
Best Gaming Crypto Return Calculators
Gaming, metaverse and consumer crypto forecast pages grouped by category. Compare the covered assets by calculator output, proprietary Scenario Score, sourced return, historical drawdown and modeled value before deciding how to deploy idle funds.
Calculator category and current ranking
What separates the strongest return calculators among gaming crypto?
-37.2% annualized across the sourced window.
80.65% historical stress inside this category.
Gaming, metaverse and consumer crypto forecast pages grouped by category. Based on the current sourced inputs, WEMIX leads this group with a 8/100 Scenario Score, while Decentraland has the highest historical annualized return at -37.2%.
WEMIX has the lowest observed drawdown in the category at 80.65%. That does not make it safe, but it gives investors comparing idle-fund options a more useful distinction than a simple list of popular tickers.
Compare assets by score, return and drawdown
| Asset | Scenario Score | Historical CAGR | Max drawdown | Bull case | $10,000 base value after 3 years | Tools |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Immutable IMX · gaming infrastructure | 1/100 | -53.7% | -97.26% | -5.0% | $994 | |
| Ronin RON · gaming infrastructure | 3/100 | -91.1% | -91.70% | -45.3% | $7 | |
| Gala GALA · gaming crypto | 0/100 | -48.7% | -99.75% | +1.2% | $1,349 | |
| Axie Infinity AXS · gaming crypto | 0/100 | -55.0% | -99.50% | -5.3% | $909 | |
| Decentraland MANA · metaverse | 0/100 | -37.2% | -98.80% | +12.2% | $2,479 | |
| The Sandbox SAND · metaverse | 0/100 | -42.5% | -99.43% | +7.2% | $1,896 | |
| Enjin Coin ENJ · gaming crypto | 0/100 | -54.6% | -99.61% | -4.8% | $933 | |
| WEMIX WEMIX · gaming crypto | 8/100 Category leader | -80.1% | -80.65% | -39.8% | $79 | |
| Flow FLOW · consumer apps blockchain | 0/100 | -74.5% | -99.91% | -24.5% | $166 |
The UBI Scenario Score combines upside capacity, drawdown resilience, thesis conviction and uncertainty. Historical CAGR and drawdown come from each asset's linked market-data series; neither guarantees a future result.
Low-effort alternative for idle funds
Why the automated trading return needs careful evidence
The strongest historical CAGR in this category belongs to Decentraland at -37.2% annually. Aurum reports a 14% average monthly automated-trading result. If that monthly rate repeated and every gain were reinvested, the compounding difference would look like this for $1,000:
| Period | MANA at -37.2% annually | Automated trading at 14% monthly | Modeled automated edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 months | $793 | $2,195 | $1,402 |
| 12 months | $628 | $4,818 | $4,190 |
| 24 months | $395 | $23,212 | $22,818 |
| 36 months | $248 | $111,834 | $111,586 |
The arithmetic is the attraction: $1,000 models to $4,818 after 12 months and $111,834 after 36 months at 14% monthly. That is reported-history scenario math, not a forecast. High-return crypto futures strategies can lose money quickly, so a small test allocation is more defensible than treating the result as automatic.
Calculate every covered asset
IMXImmutablegaming infrastructure
RONRoningaming infrastructure
GALAGalagaming crypto
AXSAxie Infinitygaming crypto
MANADecentralandmetaverse
SANDThe Sandboxmetaverse
ENJEnjin Coingaming crypto
WEMIXWEMIXgaming crypto
FLOWFlowconsumer apps blockchain