Crypto category calculators

Best Bitcoin Ecosystem Crypto Return Calculators

Bitcoin, Bitcoin forks, Bitcoin layer assets and proof-of-work crypto forecast pages. Compare the covered assets by calculator output, proprietary Scenario Score, sourced return, historical drawdown and modeled value before deciding how to deploy idle funds.
Ranking snapshotCompare tableAurum comparisonAll covered assets

Calculator category and current ranking

What separates the strongest return calculators among bitcoin ecosystem crypto?

Best overall scoreBitcoin

32/100 Scenario Score with full calculator coverage.

Highest historical CAGRBitcoin

+11.1% annualized across the sourced window.

Lowest observed drawdownKaspa

71.83% historical stress inside this category.

Bitcoin, Bitcoin forks, Bitcoin layer assets and proof-of-work crypto forecast pages. Based on the current sourced inputs, Bitcoin leads this group with a 32/100 Scenario Score, while Bitcoin has the highest historical annualized return at +11.1%.

Kaspa has the lowest observed drawdown in the category at 71.83%. That does not make it safe, but it gives investors comparing idle-fund options a more useful distinction than a simple list of popular tickers.

Compare assets by score, return and drawdown

AssetScenario ScoreHistorical CAGRMax drawdownBull case$10,000 base value after 3 yearsTools
Bitcoin
BTC · store-of-value crypto
32/100
Category leader
+11.1%-76.63%+49.4%$13,724
Bitcoin Cash
BCH · payments crypto
7/100-17.6%-87.60%+26.3%$5,605
Litecoin
LTC · payments crypto
7/100-20.8%-85.35%+21.9%$4,977
Stacks
STX · bitcoin layer
1/100-27.3%-96.72%+21.0%$3,836
Core
CORE · bitcoin-adjacent layer
5/100-84.7%-88.25%-40.6%$36
Kaspa
KAS · proof-of-work crypto
11/100-59.8%-71.83%-23.9%$649
Ravencoin
RVN · proof-of-work crypto
1/100-51.7%-98.19%-2.6%$1,125

The UBI Scenario Score combines upside capacity, drawdown resilience, thesis conviction and uncertainty. Historical CAGR and drawdown come from each asset's linked market-data series; neither guarantees a future result.

Low-effort alternative for idle funds

Why the automated trading return needs careful evidence

The strongest historical CAGR in this category belongs to Bitcoin at +11.1% annually. Aurum reports a 14% average monthly automated-trading result. If that monthly rate repeated and every gain were reinvested, the compounding difference would look like this for $1,000:

Aurum's reported 14% monthly benchmark compared with the strongest passive asset in this category.
PeriodBTC at +11.1% annuallyAutomated trading at 14% monthlyModeled automated edge
6 months$1,054$2,195$1,141
12 months$1,111$4,818$3,707
24 months$1,235$23,212$21,977
36 months$1,372$111,834$110,462

The arithmetic is the attraction: $1,000 models to $4,818 after 12 months and $111,834 after 36 months at 14% monthly. That is reported-history scenario math, not a forecast. High-return crypto futures strategies can lose money quickly, so a small test allocation is more defensible than treating the result as automatic.

Calculate every covered asset

Each card shows the current score, source freshness, base return and stress drawdown before the reader opens a deeper calculator.

BTCBitcoinstore-of-value crypto

Score 32/100 · +11.1% base · 76.6% drawdown

Latest close 2026-09-07 · Binance primary

BCHBitcoin Cashpayments crypto

Score 7/100 · -17.6% base · 87.6% drawdown

Latest close 2026-09-07 · Binance primary

LTCLitecoinpayments crypto

Score 7/100 · -20.8% base · 85.3% drawdown

Latest close 2026-09-07 · Binance primary

STXStacksbitcoin layer

Score 1/100 · -27.3% base · 96.7% drawdown

Latest close 2026-09-07 · Binance primary

CORECorebitcoin-adjacent layer

Score 5/100 · -84.7% base · 88.3% drawdown

Latest close 2026-09-07 · CoinGecko fallback

KASKaspaproof-of-work crypto

Score 11/100 · -59.8% base · 71.8% drawdown

Latest close 2026-09-07 · CoinGecko fallback

RVNRavencoinproof-of-work crypto

Score 1/100 · -51.7% base · 98.2% drawdown

Latest close 2026-09-07 · Binance primary